KUALA LUMPUR: The complainant in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan had said that there was penetration, despite his medical proforma stating that it was “rectal attempted”, a doctor told the High Court.
Forensic pathologist Dr Razuin Rahimi, who is now based in Hospital Sg Buloh, told the court Wednesday that she had interviewed Mohd Saiful at Hospital Kuala Lumpur, prior to his medical examination there on June 28, 2008.
During her examination-in-chief by Solicitor-General II Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden, she was asked why she had circled “Yes” for “rectal attempted”, to which she replied: “This line is a little confusing, because I wouldn’t know whether it reached the rectum (during penetration).
“If there was a line that said ‘anus performed’, I would have circled that.”
Later, during her cross-examination by defence counsel Karpal Singh, she disagreed that rectal penetration was the same as anal penetration, which amounted to sodomy.
“The rectum is above the anus,” she said. More here
As the National Top Selling Gay Soft Porn unravel its new episode........monkey can't help but wonder...
What is the Average Distance from the Anus to the Rectum?
Why so?
If there was penetration and throughout the whole eposide Anwar did not reach the Rectum
Ada sikit kureng tuh brader.........
The length of the Anal Canal based on a statistical study is
The authors measured the length of the surgical anal canal (anorectal ring to anal verge) in 108 men and 103 women; the age ranged from 18 to 90 years (average 59 years). The average length of the surgical anal canal was 4.2 cm (range 3.0–5.3 cm). In men the average length was 4.4 cm (range 3.2–5.3 cm) compared with the average length of 4.0 cm (range 3.0–5.0 cm) in women (P<0.001). The average length of the anatomic anal canal (dentate line to anal verge) was 2.2 cm (range 1.0–3.8 cm). In men, the average length was 2.2 cm (range 1.4–3.8 cm), whereas in women the average length was 2.0 cm (range 1.0–3.2 cm) (P<.01). The length of the anatomic and cnal has no relationship to the length of the surgical anal canal orvice versa (P<0.1). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of the surgical anal canal or the anatomic anal canal in persons below 60 years old versus those above in either sex more here
And there was "Full Penetration"
Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan claimed that there was full anal penetration when he was allegedly sodomised by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, a government pathologist testified today.more here
and he "did not reach the rectum"........ takkan la mamat tu below 3cm full erect?
sedih siut....
the only logical explaination now is that Saiful sphincter muscle is really tight and impenetrable even with Lubrication....
And Anwar tak tahan and ejaculated into his anus and rectum....
Now let us us look at 377 Penal Code
Carnal intercourse against the order of nature377A. Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.Explanation—Penetration is sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section.
Punishment for committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature377B. Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to whipping. More here
I still don't understand why Karpal tried to ask the Anal Penetration Vs Rectal Penetration question
One last question folks
HOW MANY OF MALAYSIAN DO YOU THINK IS GUILTY OF 377(The Blowjob Part)?
Ini macam banyak susah....
Lets say there's a saiko virgin who goes around blowing everyone in town and then reports to the Police that someone has "introduced a penis into her mouth".....ok that maybe a wee bit remote but what if your wife claims that you forced her to blow you in a divorce proceeding
Mampus siut!!! 20 years and whipping tuh
Monkey thinks the time have come for a petition to reform the 377 to exclude consensual Blowjobs?
Are you with me??
Are you with me??
Singapore have moved ahead to repeal its 377 Blowjob and Anal Sex between Heterosexual after a police constable Anis Abdullah was convicted under 377 for receiving a blowjob from a minor..
67 We will be removing the use of the archaic term “Carnal Intercourse Against the Order of Nature” from the Penal Code. By repealing section 377 (Unnatural offences), any sexual act including oral and anal sex, between a consenting heterosexual couple, 16 years of age and above will no longer be criminalized when done in private. As the Penal Code reflects social norms and values, deleting section 377 is the right thing to do as Singaporeans by and large do not find oral and anal sex between two consenting male and female in private offensive or unacceptable. This is clear from the public reaction to the case of PP v Anis Abdullah in 2004 and confirmed through the feedback received in the course of this Penal Code review consultation.Go here
For more technical readings on the Anus and Rectum go here