Thursday, August 11, 2016

Open Letter to the Missing Public Prosecutor

Dear Public Prosecutor

Where in the world are you Sir?

I have a feeling that you are stuck inside Appandi Kandasamy who prefers to be an Attorney General and advice this Government who is now suspected to have won the previous election funded EXCLUSIVELY from Proceeds of Unlawful Activities.

Anyway Mr Public Prosecutor

We've heard so many times about #MalaysianOfficial1 alibis and your immediate reaction towards that "critical piece" of evidence. From what we know so far he was investigated for Corruption and CBT by our enforcement agencies.

All of these cases are CLOSED SHUT now, irrespective of the introduction of new evidence into the Public domain.

Let's start with some Public Domain information...

DATA 1: What is the Actual Status of the Donation Case Investigated by SPRM

"Dalam pada itu, satu kertas siasatan berkaitan kes RM2.6 bilion juga telah dikemukakan ke Peguam Negara pada hari ini. Siasatan membabitkan saksi-saksi di dalam negara telah selesai sepenuhnya. Keterangan daripada pihak yang mendakwa sebagai penderma juga telah diperolehi. Bagaimanapun SPRM masih perlu melengkapkan siasatan berkaitan dokumen dan keterangan melibatkan beberapa institusi kewangan di luar negara. Dokumen dan keterangan ini hanya boleh diambil melalui proses Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) kerana ia terikat kepada peruntukan undang-undang perbankan negara berkenaan. Proses MLA hanya boleh dikeluarkan dengan persetujuan dan kebenaran Peguam Negara seperti mana diperuntukkan oleh undang-undang antarabangsa. SPRM telah membuat permohonan di bawah MLA kepada Jabatan Peguam Negara bagi mendapatkan dokumen dan keterangan tersebut. "
MACC 31st December 2015 Press Statement (here)

KEY WORDS: PIHAK YANG MENDAKWA SEBAGAI PENDERMA

MACC NEVER CONFIRMS THAT THE PIHAK IS THE PERDERMA

What happen to that Kertas Siasatan?

SURUHANJAYA Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) mengesahkan telah menerima kembali kertas siasatan berhubung kes SRC International dan dana RM2.6 bilion daripada Jabatan Peguam Negara hari ini. SPRM mengambil maklum arahan daripada Jabatan Peguam Negara yang memerlukan penjelasan lanjut mengenai beberapa cadangan dan tindakan yang telah dikemukakan oleh SPRM sebelum ini. Respons SPRM kepada permintaan Jabatan Peguam Negara akan dikemukakan dalam waktu terdekat.
MACC 18th January 2016 (here)

After a bit of Ping Pong game between  AGC and MACC.....

Appandi had his Oscar Winning Performance on the 26th January 2016
“I am satisfied. Based on statements by the witnesses and supporting documents produced by MACC to me it shows that the fund channelled into the prime minister’s account amounting to USD681 million (RM2.08 billion) is a personal contribution to the PM from the royal family of Saudi Arabia and was given to him without any compensation. “MACC in their investigation found and recorded the statements by the witnesses including the individual who channelled the fund and confirmed that the fund was given to the PM on a personal basis,” said Apandi during a press conference held here today.
He said there was no need for Malaysians to demand for mutual legal assistance from any foreign countries for the purpose of completing the criminal investigation conducted by MACC as no criminal offense had taken place. (here)

Ouch.....

MACC spoke again after getting inputs from the Operation Review Panel

Memandangkan siasatan SPRM berhubung dakwaan wang derma RM2.6 bilion masih belum lengkap, Panel telah mengesyorkan agar SPRM meneruskan siasatannya dan memohon Peguam Negara agar mengeluarkan kebenaran Bantuan Undang-undang Bersama (MLA) bagi SPRM memperoleh bukti dan dokumen-dokumen daripada institusi kewangan di luar negara sebagai sebahagian daripada siasatan ke atas isu RM2.6 bilion.  MACC 24 February 2016


Jom kita gi balik to Pendi punya

He said there was no need for Malaysians to demand for mutual legal assistance from any foreign countries for the purpose of completing the criminal investigation conducted by MACC as no criminal offense had taken place
NO CRIMINAL OFFENSE HAD TAKEN PLACE

Based on what?

Based on this

Based on statements by the witnesses and supporting documents produced by MACC 
Apa la agaknye Supporting Documents from this Benevolent Alab?


Probable Document 1: USD 375,000,000 Blackstone letter

A you may view it (here)

Key words being used are

"shall be remitted to you at such times and in such manner as I deem fit either directly from my personal bank accounts or through my instructed company bank accounts (such as Blackstone Asia Real Estate Partners Limited)."

Probable Document 2: USD 800,000,000 Tanore Letter





QUESTIONS FROM THE RAKYAT:

Can a Disclosure Letter containing the words "MY INSTRUCTED COMPANY BANK ACCOUNTS (SUCH AS BLACKSTONE ASIA REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LIMITED or TANORE FINANCE CORP)" be the HOLY GRAIL OF AUTHENTICATED BENEFICIARY OWNERSHIP DATA?

Did the Letter provide supporting information to prove ownership of the "Such And Such Companies"

Allow me to illustrate another bizzare observation with regards to Beneficiary Ownership Data

I bet you guys remember the Episode when BNM Letter to PAC leaked

In there it said

"Based on the information from the AUTHORITY
(authority responsible for incorporation of companies
who has the register of members) GOODSTAR LTD
IS BENEFICIALLY OWNED BY LOW TAEK JHO

GoodStar is a new entity that we now have HARD DATA to be apart of the Flows into #MalaysianOfficial1

We suspected it before but never had any data.

What BNM said MATCH THE EXACT DATA IN DOJ SUIT

Before we had people selling crappy sekolah tadika bullshit about Bearer Shares Being Movable as a counter to PSI being the legitimate owner of GoodStar...

I wrote this in FB

FACT 2: Was Bearer Shares in Seychelles MOVABLE i.e can it be transferred main bagi kat sapa sapa sahaja

Most Countries HAVE IMMOBILISED BEARER SHARES, some have gone towards total ELIMINATION OF BEARER SHARES
So what is the rule in Seychelles?

"NEW BEARER SHARE TRANSFER REQUIREMENTS
The position prior to the Bearer Share Amendments was that ownership of a bearer share was transferable by mere delivery of the bearer share certificate. The new position under the Bearer Share Amendments is that a bearer share is now transferable by delivery of the share certificate relating to such bearer share and notification of transfer. “Notification of transfer” is effected by delivery to the company’s registered agent in Seychelles of a written notice, signed by the transferor bearer shareholder, stating the name and address of the transferor, the name and address of the transferee and the date on which the certificate relating to the bearer share was delivered to the transferee.
Accordingly, notwithstanding delivery of a bearer share certificate to a new holder, a transfer of ownership of the share shall not be regarded as effective until “notification of transfer” (as defined above) is made to the IBC’s registered agent in Seychelles.
Upon receipt of the bearer share transfer notice, the Company’s registered agent in Seychelles shall cause:
the name and address of the transferee to be entered in the Share Register as the holder of the relevant bearer share;
to be entered in the Share Register, the date on which the transferor ceased to be the holder of the relevant bearer share, which shall be deemed to be the date on which the registered agent received notification of transfer."

When was the RULE EFFECTIVE ?

Law was passed in Parliament 28th April 2009 and became effective via President Assent on 27th May 2009

FACT 3: GoodStar LTD was incorporated May 18th 2009, bearer share issued on June 2nd 2009 and dissolved on May 2nd 2014 which means that

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE OWNERSHIP IN GOODSTAR WITHOUT NOTIFYING IBC REGISTERED AGENTS


Hasan Cari Makan masih tak cukup Makan

Giler slow lu doe....Tony sampai cabut lari

Tabulebela Tabulebela

Anyway all of these Companies now form part of the flow into #MalaysianOfficial1 account according to the Yahudi Laknatullah Some Short Black Momma wanting to GET BACK USD 1 BILLION FOR THE RAKYAT. 

According to her Yaknatullah Agenda of wanting to obliterate the Malays from their Tanah Tumpah Darah Ku.... it kinda look like this...



Pendi KandaSamy masih berfikir nak buat Watching Brief pulak 

Dulu ye la orang panggil Yang Arif

Macam tak berapa Arif aje.

Dia punya level bab Arif Arif ni semua ajaib tahap gaban 

Recall this FAQ on AGC Official Website 
Source (here)


WHO IS THIS SAYA? 

MENTAL CASE KE

YOU ARE SAYING "SAYA PASTI TIDAK PADA BILA BILA MASA MALAYSIAN OFFICIAL 1 MENGETAHUI USUL SEBENAR DANA YANG DIPINDAHKAN KE DALAM AKAUNNYA"

THE RECIPIENT WHO IS THE MINISTER OF FINANCE OF MALAYSIA DOES NOT KNOW THE ASAL USUL SEBENAR DANA? 

HOLY FUCKING SHIT

EPIC Doe...

Anyway according to this Powderful Saya from JABATAN PEGUAM NEGERA EVEN MALAYSIAN OFFICIAL 1 DOESN'T KNOW

How is it that you are so sure about these Alab Letters? 

You wanna know something....if you had GRANTED MACC Mutual Legal Assistance

Lu budget dia balik tail in between their legs tak jumpa satu benda 

Atau dia akan dapat EXACT MONEY FLOW AND BENEFICIARY OWNERSHIP DATA AS PER DOJ SUIT?

Which one Yg Bekas Arif? 

Or is it Yang Kurang Arif sekarang...

Anyway lets go back to what the MACC OPERATION PANEL SAID AFTER YOU DENIED THEIR REQUEST....


Memandangkan siasatan SPRM berhubung dakwaan wang derma RM2.6 bilion masih belum lengkap, Panel telah mengesyorkan agar SPRM meneruskan siasatannya dan memohon Peguam Negara agar mengeluarkan kebenaran Bantuan Undang-undang Bersama (MLA) bagi SPRM memperoleh bukti dan dokumen-dokumen daripada institusi kewangan di luar negara sebagai sebahagian daripada siasatan ke atas isu RM2.6 bilion.  MACC 24 February 2016

MASIH BELUM LENGKAP

MEMOHON MENGELUARKAN KEBENARAN MLA

Do you want to face another Judicial Review? 

Brani Pendi?

I really wanna see you FIGHT THIS ONE OUT

You are really strange to me dude

Masa BNM mintak buat Criminal Charge lu jawap 

The officials of 1MDB at all material times i.e. during the process of obtaining the permissions had complied with the directions given, hence the permissions/approvals granted. Until and unless it can be shown that the officials had deliberately or knew or even recklessly provided information that were false in material particulars, they had committed no offense under this act
The Bank Negara Malaysia however vide a letter dated 1 October 2015 requested for a review of the decision citing omission on the part of 1MDB i.e. non-disclosure of certain information. As far as omission is concerned, there is no obligation to inform unless requested. In this respect and the fact that there is no new evidence made available, we do not see the necessity to review.
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S CHAMBERS MALAYSIA13 OCTOBER 2015
(here)


Sekarang DOJ cakap benda sama: 




Guano Yang Tok Brapo Arif? 

Demo nok gi holiday Amareka ko? 

Tok soh la weh...

Gini gini gini..

Recall how I started the post....

From what we know so far he was investigated for Corruption and CBT by our enforcement agencies.
Was he ever been investigated under our very own equivalent of the DOJ Approach? 




HE IS THE MINISTER IN CHARGE OF THIS ACT......

Elok la tu...

Let us look into the Act...

Lets start with some key component of benda benda gua nak merepek ni








5 X THE SUM OF VALUE OF PROCEEDS OR 5 Million WHICH EVER IS HIGHER...

Mak Oi....tercirit nak bayar

But what would be the key initial steps as they go into Investigation Mode....

The Super Cool Seizure Move...







What can we sieze?

MalaysianOfficial1 Accounts and ALL RECIPIENTS Including what ever ASSETS THEY HAVE ACQUIRED WITH IT.

Well he once said that All this was for the Party....

Don't listen to me ya...better you watch for yourselves to understand how deep in Twilight Zone we are



So Ahli Ahli yang  seParty dengan Malaysian Official 1

Cuba angkat tangan sapa pernah jumpa Alab ni?

Surat pun sebut Sebillion Lebih  (800 + 375)....macho doe

Gua nak bagi lu banyak ni tak tahu bila ikut gua ...nak pakai account mana pun tak sure lagi mungkin pakai co Such and Such...i lurve u mate...mua muah..

Benda macam ni ke Yang Tak Berapa Arif sedang pegang sebagai BUKTI

So Yang Tak Berapa Arif

Apakah permohonan MACC terkait MLA akan diluluskan?



Takkan Yang Tak Arif Nak IMPEDE THE COMPLETION OF MACC INVESTIGATION...

Ke nak kena bukak kes baru pulak under AMLA?

Anyway saya rasa lebih baik sekiranya kita sieze DULU semua HARTA BENDA MALAYSIAN OFFICIAL 1 DAN KELUARGA JUGA AHLI2 PARTY YG TERKAIT.

LOCK DOWN.....

Sampai bila?



Lepas tu kalu kalah CASE pun boleh pengang lagi....sempoi



And it's only A CIVIL PROCEEDINGS punya standard aja...

Yang Account2 terbabit pun kita patut sieze....

Mana tau boleh pancing Pak Alab yang Budiman......Bet you all the UMNO Folks will line up to thank his generous contribution to the Party....


Ahli Ahli Party Malaysian Official 1

Bangun la kamu di pagi hari dan Berdoalah Kepada Yang Maha Esa

Agar Pak Alab yang Budiman Ini Akan Tampil

Nama Presiden Parti Kamu Sudah TerCemar

Beliau Harus Bangun Menentang Fitnah Yahudi Laknatullah


Back to you Mr Missing Public Prosecutor....

Takkan la lu taknak ambik precautionary measures?

Auditor dah cabut lari cakap kat NOONE CAN RELY ON OUR ACCOUNTS ANYMORE

That's...how REAL THIS SHIT IS...

IPIC Dispute satu hal lagi USD 6.5 Billion....kalu kalah (with 99.99% probability) kena bayar pastu Investments "Cayman Units dan GIL Investments" hangus...

Our own Auditor General says USD 7.0 Billions Unaccounted For.

We have the Swiss putting the numbers at USD 4 Billions..Singapore some other numbers gua pun dah lupa...

Kat US Sebillion....

Giler mental doe..

Nak Kebil kebil lagi..

Mr Missing Public Prosecutor...

Tak payah takut kat dia...cakap ni precautionary measure aja sebab DOJ dah masuk Suit...kat dalam tu dia sebut Malaysia Official 1 menerima PROCEEDS....

Jadi itu sudah JADI BARANG WAJIB UNTUK DI SIASAT BUKAN UNTUK BUAT WATCHING BRIEF APEKELANCAU



Ok folks....sudah pukul 430 pagi...

I'm beat....

I hope he answers....
Minds are like parachutes; they work best when open. -Lord Thomas Dewer