The R-Factor: Strategies of the Director of Strategies

I bet quite a number of you have seen the video presentation by Rafizi Ramli, what you think of it?

Masuk akal? Ke Merepek....

The thing is....tiap kali dia merepek gua tanye soalan

Baik baik tau ...bukan gua maki hamun...

Once when he was yapping about the Free Education thinggy...

Gua pun masuk la tanye dalam timeline dia....

Here's a summary of what I asked

May 22......Lama giler beb...

Kalu Rafizi tak reti pun orang lain boleh reply kan.....

Mana pergi semua macai2?



Anyway lets get back to this guy...

I wish it was Ong Tee Keat against him.....

Guarantee menang baik punye...

But anyway....this dude...

With a Title of Director of Strategies...

Let us put them to test

Take the Cheap Car Policy...if you are an existing car owner this policy will take value away from you (here)  put them together with the Lower Fuel Policy...guarantee Rabak..

The economic case for increasing subsidies on petrol is even clearer, because there isn’t one. Instead, both economic theory and global practice suggest that the optimum, social welfare-maximising policy is to tax petrol use, not subsidise it. Put these together with the plan for public transport, and you have what can best be described as an inconsistent, even schizophrenic, approach to public and private transportation. The very same analysis that supports removing duties on cars provides the rationale for removing, not increasing, subsidies on petrol. Reducing the private costs of car use, which are already low, will guarantee the failure of public transport policy. The public non-fiscal costs of reducing private costs of car use will also likely offset the private benefits involved. (HishamH of Economics Malaysia here , BM here)

 Tu satu Strategy

Let us evaluate his Kacang Jempol Strategy as another sample...

Check that out folks....

I think I was the first to kantoi him with BAFIA(here) not long after he even admitted his kebangangan and siap demonize the Act...

Rafizi said although he was not aware of the strict regulations under BAFIA when first exposing the NFCorp scandal, he was shocked to later find that “even if the Agong exposes something” he has no immunity and can be imprisoned. “The BAFIA is an Act to protect criminals and thieves. Even if a bank sees something wrong, it will be liable to five years’ jail if it opens its mouth,” he added (here)

Tak boleh belah.....

Sekarang dah kena charge...berapa tahun tu beb...

Kalu mamat ni menang kesian orang Pandan MP masuk jail pasal bahlul malas baca Undang Undang Malaysia

Kata PR banyak lawyer...

Tak kan sekor pun tak reti?

Kan ada X Finance Minister leading the team....biar betik pakcik......

BAFIA tu bawah lu punya jurisdiction tu beb....

Ni semua pasal poyo semangat lebih.....nak dapat airtime....rasa macam best aje..

Expose....expose...expose....

Apekelancau.....

Eh....soalan Free Education bila nak jawap?

Gua tanye 22 May 2012

Dah 347 hari tu beb....

Rabak la lu beb...