Tuesday, July 30, 2013

The Cinion Dilemma

Fucking Cinions.....look at them



Giler buruk perangai doe...

Ada jugak yang semangat kental..sanggup beratur macam negara Komunis


 

 Interesting species these Cinions.... Predatory in every aspects....

 Semua telan....budak mati dalam perut pun dia sanggup makan....gua tak kasi link la...ngeri siot...

 Anyway of late gua tengok Cinions Cinions semua makin kurang ajar....

 Lu pehal? Betul lu brani ke?

 Lu orang giler buruk siot... Gua tengok Apek2 keliling ASEAN jauh lagi cun dari lu orang semua...

Dah la fugly perangai macam sial....

Silap baka la kut yang turun Tongkang duu la kut....

Talking about this turun tongkang thing..

I once build a graph to show how many actually turun naik Tongkang kat Singapore...




Malaya: Annual data for Indian immigration and emigration exist from 1880 onwards and are accurate because of the Malayan government's role in bringing Indian workers to Malaya. Unskilled laborers from the subcontinent constituted the great bulk of the Malayan traffic, but the published data also include an unknown number of other Indians such as merchants traveling between the two countries. Until the 1930s, when demand for labor on rubber estates declined sharply, non-laborers were a small proportion of the Indian totals (Sandhu, 1969, pp. 95-125). Data source: Saw, 1970, p. 52. Almost all Chinese immigrants to Malaya first landed at Singapore. Beginning in 1881, records of Chinese examined at the port by its officials, by health officers or by the Chinese Protectorate (a government department set up to safeguard Chinese welfare) provide a reliable measure of annual immigrant inflows. But no statistics for Chinese emigration were kept before 1916, and until 1930 include only Chinese deck passengers departing from Singapore. Beginning in 1931 data are for deck passengers leaving all Malayan ports (in effect Penang as well as Singapore) and suggest understatement in the 1916-1930 departure figures. For 1911-1915 Chinese emigration from Malaya was estimated as 400,000 (Malaya, 1932, p. 113) and data for 1930-1939 refer to 1930-1938 only. Data sources: Straits Settlements,1881-1938 (from this source see years 1881-1911 immigration reports; Secretary for Chinese Affairs for 1930-1938; Progress of the People of the Straits Settlements for 1934-1938); Malaya, 1921, p. 21 and 1932, p. 113.

Source (here) Globalization and Labor Market Integration in Late Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century Asia 


Giler banyak Cinions siot...9,694,362 Cinions masuk from 1880 to 1939...

Data keluar tak boleh harap tak tahu mana Cinions sudah pergi....

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Risk Management of Tabung Hazeez

When Rocky broke the news (here) that Tabung Haji was gonna get Double E Azeez as its Chairman I said biar betik?

Well I guess that piece of rumour is now cast in stone....

Rocky asked in his post

But question is, will he have what it takes to re-organize Tabung Haji?

 Don't know what Azeez has in mind but I got one that's been lingering in my mind....

For a start kita kasi sunat sikit function Tabung Haji.

Which part..... let's try their investment management activities.

As an institution its core function is actually the Pilgrim Organisation rather than the investment management component. There's also a "Putrajaya Put" embedded in the Act

Source here
Remote situation unless there is a major failure in the investment management function.....mmmm

One way to minimize that is to outsource it to its next door neighbor, our very own Permodalan Nasional Berhad, tak payah pindah jauh pun.

This would increase the overall fund size under management and give greater scale for strategic international investment opportunities. The scale on Islamic Investment Management can also be achieved, who knows one day it could be an entity on its own. Mana la tau tak salah pun untuk berangan....

Anyway minus the politics, tell me why they should not do it?

Minds are like parachutes; they work best when open. -Lord Thomas Dewer